Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rommel"
(r) |
(Just ignore for now) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: The point is that '''you''' don't decide what opinion is widespread. | :: The point is that '''you''' don't decide what opinion is widespread. | ||
:: Regardless of one's opinion, grousing about it doesn't belong in any article on the wiki. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 01:08, 6 November 2022 (EDT) | :: Regardless of one's opinion, grousing about it doesn't belong in any article on the wiki. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 01:08, 6 November 2022 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sarna should stay out of this. All we got is a plan for a future intention, the reasons for which were described as "obvious" combined with a refusal to elaborate. That flies in the face of the fact-based wiki I wantSarna to be. It’s not worth noting; actually, this kind of non-information should be actively ignored at least until something BT-relevant has actually happened. Let’s not jump to conclusions, promulgate rumors or even fight about what this was "obviously" supposed to mean. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 01:38, 6 November 2022 (EST) |
Revision as of 02:38, 6 November 2022
So I guess we're not going to note the widespread opinion that removing the Rommel tank from BattleTech is a dumb idea?
- I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. Madness Divine (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT)
- It's one of the original tanks from TRO 3025 and removing it "because nazis" smacks of idiocy. Patton/Rommel were a historic rivalry from WWII and it makes perfect sense to have a pair of related tanks named after them. Lanzman
- The point is that you don't decide what opinion is widespread.
- Regardless of one's opinion, grousing about it doesn't belong in any article on the wiki. Madness Divine (talk) 01:08, 6 November 2022 (EDT)
Sarna should stay out of this. All we got is a plan for a future intention, the reasons for which were described as "obvious" combined with a refusal to elaborate. That flies in the face of the fact-based wiki I wantSarna to be. It’s not worth noting; actually, this kind of non-information should be actively ignored at least until something BT-relevant has actually happened. Let’s not jump to conclusions, promulgate rumors or even fight about what this was "obviously" supposed to mean. Frabby (talk) 01:38, 6 November 2022 (EST)