Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wolf's Dragoons (sourcebook)"
Sarna News
(Sourcebook vs (sourcebook)) |
(→Contents Links: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As much as "Sourcebook" appears to be a part of the title, it is my opinion it was not intended to standout from the other sourcebooks. I changed the name accordingly.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:09, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | As much as "Sourcebook" appears to be a part of the title, it is my opinion it was not intended to standout from the other sourcebooks. I changed the name accordingly.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:09, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Contents Links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Question : Do all of those characters need links? I've made more WD Bio Articles than anyone, and the vast majority of these, I wouldn't think about writing an article for. I'm totally fine leaving up "red links" to elements that SHOULD have an article someday, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Thoughts? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 17:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 29 January 2011
As much as "Sourcebook" appears to be a part of the title, it is my opinion it was not intended to standout from the other sourcebooks. I changed the name accordingly.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:09, 17 July 2008 (CDT)
Contents Links
Question : Do all of those characters need links? I've made more WD Bio Articles than anyone, and the vast majority of these, I wouldn't think about writing an article for. I'm totally fine leaving up "red links" to elements that SHOULD have an article someday, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Thoughts? ClanWolverine101 17:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)