Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Events"
(Added comment about moving articles to sub-categories.) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It would be desirable to move all articles that belongs to Category:Events into sub-categories. I have started doing so. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 12:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | It would be desirable to move all articles that belongs to Category:Events into sub-categories. I have started doing so. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 12:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :That sounds fine. Thanks for that level of clean-up work.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 15:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Classification progress report == | ||
+ | Right now there are ten articles left in the main Event category: | ||
+ | * Two timelines. Create a master Timeline Category, keep them here, or lump them with the year pages? | ||
+ | ** [[Manufacturing Timeline]] | ||
+ | ** [[Timeline]] | ||
+ | * Two articles waiting for the final name of the atrocities category. | ||
+ | ** [[Capella Prime Massacre]] | ||
+ | ** [[Novaya Zemlya Incident]] | ||
+ | * Five articles whose quality is so low that that they might need an urgent revamp or deletion. | ||
+ | ** [[Stewart War]] - Lack of context. | ||
+ | ** [[Ruchbach Annexation]] - Sub-stub quality. | ||
+ | ** [[Exodus (2242)]] - Sub-stub quality. | ||
+ | ** [[Naval Battle over Oriente]] - Total lack of context. | ||
+ | ** [[Draconis Combine Invasion]] - Very badly named. | ||
+ | * One that probably should be a faction instead. | ||
+ | ** [[Fortress Republic]] | ||
+ | --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 20:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | : It looks like I managed to finish classifying the articles. I have only left the timelines in the Events master category, since I see no need to create a separate sub-category for them. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 08:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Congratulations, Neufeld. Looks good. We may need to keep an eye on the category, as it could start filling up with articles, as people may not realize the category is now a 'mother'.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:25, 28 August 2011
It would be desirable to move all articles that belongs to Category:Events into sub-categories. I have started doing so. --Neufeld 12:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- That sounds fine. Thanks for that level of clean-up work.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 15:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Classification progress report[edit]
Right now there are ten articles left in the main Event category:
- Two timelines. Create a master Timeline Category, keep them here, or lump them with the year pages?
- Two articles waiting for the final name of the atrocities category.
- Five articles whose quality is so low that that they might need an urgent revamp or deletion.
- Stewart War - Lack of context.
- Ruchbach Annexation - Sub-stub quality.
- Exodus (2242) - Sub-stub quality.
- Naval Battle over Oriente - Total lack of context.
- Draconis Combine Invasion - Very badly named.
- One that probably should be a faction instead.
--Neufeld 20:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- It looks like I managed to finish classifying the articles. I have only left the timelines in the Events master category, since I see no need to create a separate sub-category for them. --Neufeld 08:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)