Sarna News: Bad 'Mechs - Icestorm

Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Independent Systems"

m (Created page with '{{WikiProject Planets}}')
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WikiProject Planets}}
 
{{WikiProject Planets}}
 +
 +
== Cleanup ==
 +
 +
The phrasing is a bit out of date, and will be moreso once we finishing with all the page-by-page category fixes and move this to Independent Systems.  The "inhabited worlds" thing puzzles me: deprecated tag/category?--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 08:08, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
 +
:Your comment (and the general process I see ongoing of converting planet categories to system categories) has piqued the following questions:  What is the definition of `system' in BattleTech?  on Sarna?  And is that definition stated anywhere?  The page [[:Category:Systems]] does not include a definition.  I would presume that `system' means [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_system `planetary system'].  But does BattleTech and/or Sarna use the same definition?  A similiar term would be a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_system `star system'], but my inkling is that we are always assuming at least one planatary body for a system in BattleTech.  But is this the case?  Are there any systems in BattleTech that have no planets?  Anyways I am not an expert on BattleTech's in-universe stellar cartography (or cartography classifications), but getting a definition of system for the root category may be helpful.
 +
 +
:I suspect that there are systems with one or more planets.  So as one converts categories from planets to systems, one may encounter interesting divisions that made require a clearer definition of the subcategory.  For instance, could a system have two independent planets? two planets allied with each other? a planet that is independent and a planet that belongs to a faction? or asteroids, moons, etc. for which control and habitation imply different nuance.  I realize that I have raised many questions, but my main encouragement is that some clarification of definitions (particularly for the root category[[:Category:Systems]]) may be in order. --[[User:Dude RB|Dude RB]] ([[User talk:Dude RB|talk]]) 09:04, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
 +
 +
::As you have correctly pointed out there, this discussion is on [[:Category talk: Planets]].  My entry into this business may be seen on [[User_talk:Dmon#Are_we_moving_the_.28Faction.29_Planets_Categories_to_.28Faction.29_Systems_Categories.3F|Dmon's talk page]].--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 10:10, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Yeah, I re-posted the key questions over at [[:Category talk: Planets]].  That is indeed the better place for the discussion.  --[[User:Dude RB|Dude RB]] ([[User talk:Dude RB|talk]]) 10:20, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::Regarding "Inhabited World", I have now seen in the wild and understand what is being referred to better. Disregard that.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 14:50, 2 July 2022 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 14:50, 2 July 2022

This article is within the scope of the Planets WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of planets. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Cleanup[edit]

The phrasing is a bit out of date, and will be moreso once we finishing with all the page-by-page category fixes and move this to Independent Systems. The "inhabited worlds" thing puzzles me: deprecated tag/category?--Talvin (talk) 08:08, 2 July 2022 (EDT)

Your comment (and the general process I see ongoing of converting planet categories to system categories) has piqued the following questions: What is the definition of `system' in BattleTech? on Sarna? And is that definition stated anywhere? The page Category:Systems does not include a definition. I would presume that `system' means `planetary system'. But does BattleTech and/or Sarna use the same definition? A similiar term would be a `star system', but my inkling is that we are always assuming at least one planatary body for a system in BattleTech. But is this the case? Are there any systems in BattleTech that have no planets? Anyways I am not an expert on BattleTech's in-universe stellar cartography (or cartography classifications), but getting a definition of system for the root category may be helpful.
I suspect that there are systems with one or more planets. So as one converts categories from planets to systems, one may encounter interesting divisions that made require a clearer definition of the subcategory. For instance, could a system have two independent planets? two planets allied with each other? a planet that is independent and a planet that belongs to a faction? or asteroids, moons, etc. for which control and habitation imply different nuance. I realize that I have raised many questions, but my main encouragement is that some clarification of definitions (particularly for the root categoryCategory:Systems) may be in order. --Dude RB (talk) 09:04, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
As you have correctly pointed out there, this discussion is on Category talk: Planets. My entry into this business may be seen on Dmon's talk page.--Talvin (talk) 10:10, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
Yeah, I re-posted the key questions over at Category talk: Planets. That is indeed the better place for the discussion. --Dude RB (talk) 10:20, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
Regarding "Inhabited World", I have now seen in the wild and understand what is being referred to better. Disregard that.--Talvin (talk) 14:50, 2 July 2022 (EDT)