Difference between revisions of "Conventional Fighter"
Sarna News
(category) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "'''Conventional fighters''' weigh from 10 to 50 tons. Though weak compared to [[aerospace | + | "'''Conventional fighters''' weigh from 10 to 50 tons. Though weak compared to [[aerospace fighters]], and unable to fly in the vacuum of space, conventional fighters are considerably cheaper to build and require a much lower base technology level. This means that most worlds, especially backwater planets, field at least a small conventional fighter force."<sup>1</sup> |
| − | fighters]], and unable to fly in the vacuum of space, conventional fighters are considerably | ||
| − | cheaper to build and require a much lower base technology level. This means that most worlds, especially backwater planets, field at least a small conventional fighter force."<sup>1</sup> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 09:24, 17 November 2006
"Conventional fighters weigh from 10 to 50 tons. Though weak compared to aerospace fighters, and unable to fly in the vacuum of space, conventional fighters are considerably cheaper to build and require a much lower base technology level. This means that most worlds, especially backwater planets, field at least a small conventional fighter force."1
References
1. "Conventional Fighters", Total Warfare, (Chicago: FanPro, 2006), 23.
 | This Article looks to be a Stub This article is a stub (i.e., in need of additional material). You can help us by expanding it. Please remove this tag when that effort is complete. |