Difference between revisions of "Talk:145th Jaguar Regulars (Clan Smoke Jaguar)"

Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:I agree with you. This was written by an Editor long ago, before some of our standards were promulgated. Normally, I'd say a '''<nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki>''' was appropriate, but in the way it is worded here, it doesn't leave much room for your scenarios, either. However, since it is in the ==Notes== section, it does give us some leeway to re-word. Compare the two versions to see what I did. Will that work, until further research is conducted? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 
:I agree with you. This was written by an Editor long ago, before some of our standards were promulgated. Normally, I'd say a '''<nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki>''' was appropriate, but in the way it is worded here, it doesn't leave much room for your scenarios, either. However, since it is in the ==Notes== section, it does give us some leeway to re-word. Compare the two versions to see what I did. Will that work, until further research is conducted? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
::That looks good. For the record, I only added the part citing Objective Raids. At the time, OR was one of the most comprehensive lists of all active units in the I.S., so I decided to check it when I saw this page. That 'destroyed to the last man' bit... I had nothing to do with that, and I've been trying to find it in the Luthien Scenario Pack. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]]

Revision as of 11:03, 21 February 2010

Assumptions

Question : Do the conclusions here take into account that the unit may have been folded into another unit, or possibly destroyed between Luthien and Tukayid? I think we need some references... ClanWolverine101

I agree with you. This was written by an Editor long ago, before some of our standards were promulgated. Normally, I'd say a {{Citation needed}} was appropriate, but in the way it is worded here, it doesn't leave much room for your scenarios, either. However, since it is in the ==Notes== section, it does give us some leeway to re-word. Compare the two versions to see what I did. Will that work, until further research is conducted? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
That looks good. For the record, I only added the part citing Objective Raids. At the time, OR was one of the most comprehensive lists of all active units in the I.S., so I decided to check it when I saw this page. That 'destroyed to the last man' bit... I had nothing to do with that, and I've been trying to find it in the Luthien Scenario Pack. ClanWolverine101