Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armor"
Sarna News
(Comment) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I agree. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | :I agree. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I agree as well. I apologise for not setting Disambig earlier. I'm still slowly learning wikipedia code. Disambig is one of things I'm unable to do on my own. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ::I agree as well. I apologise for not setting Disambig earlier. I'm still slowly learning wikipedia code. Disambig is one of things I'm unable to do on my own. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Re-linking it to [[Armor (BattleMechs & Combat Vehicles)]], which wasn't as informative when this discussion took place.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 19:37, 22 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 22 May 2021
Disambig[edit]
While valid descriptor, problem is that apart from calling tanks armor we also have the stuff said tanks are clad in: Category:Armor. Better to convert this to a disambig with links to the armor category and combat vehicle page. Cyc 00:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. --Scaletail 01:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree as well. I apologise for not setting Disambig earlier. I'm still slowly learning wikipedia code. Disambig is one of things I'm unable to do on my own. -- Wrangler 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Re-linking it to Armor (BattleMechs & Combat Vehicles), which wasn't as informative when this discussion took place.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:37, 22 May 2021 (EDT)