Difference between revisions of "Talk:BattleTech eras"
m (Talk:Succession Wars era moved to Talk:BattleTech eras) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I agree with Scaletail. I created this article yesterday as a placeholder until I could figured something else out. I'm fine with linking all the eras to a single page. --[[User:Ebakunin|Ebakunin]] 21:43, 28 August 2008 (CDT) | ::I agree with Scaletail. I created this article yesterday as a placeholder until I could figured something else out. I'm fine with linking all the eras to a single page. --[[User:Ebakunin|Ebakunin]] 21:43, 28 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::I think we're all in agreement on that (see my original post). I think its a great list-type article, but I don't think it needs to be recreated 6 times with different names. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 00:29, 29 August 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 01:29, 29 August 2008
Great idea for an article. I think this would be a good addition to the BattleTech article in the See Also section. Suggestion for another title: BattleTech Eras? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:13, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
- Do we really need seven different articles for information that is already covered elsewhere? I do like the idea for explaining the eras thing, but shouldn't we just do it in one comprehensive article? --Scaletail 19:05, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
- I agree with Scaletail. I created this article yesterday as a placeholder until I could figured something else out. I'm fine with linking all the eras to a single page. --Ebakunin 21:43, 28 August 2008 (CDT)