Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conventional Aircraft"
Sarna News
(Added question about the naming of the Boeing Jump Bomber page) |
(Boeing Jump Bomber seems to be the correct name) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Boeing Jump Bomber name== | ||
Should the Boeing Jump Bomber page be named: | Should the Boeing Jump Bomber page be named: | ||
* Boeing (Conventional Aircraft) | * Boeing (Conventional Aircraft) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
? | ? | ||
--[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 10:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 10:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This craft was introduced in the [[McCarron's Armored Cavalry (scenario pack)]] as the "Boeing Jump Bomber". While it is true that Boeing seems to be the manufacturer and Jump Bomber seems to be a description of its purpose, "Boeing Jump Bomber" has been used as the proper name for this aircraft ever since. Most importantly, the BattleTech Master Unit List (MUL) which was released on the CBT forums for beta checking lists this craft under that name. For lack of any other designation, I'd say that is what we should go by. By the way, it seems that there are already several redlinks to that name, so it's also already being used by BTW. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 10:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:44, 8 March 2010
Boeing Jump Bomber name
Should the Boeing Jump Bomber page be named:
- Boeing (Conventional Aircraft)
- Boeing Jump Bomber
- Jump Bomber
? --Neufeld 10:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- This craft was introduced in the McCarron's Armored Cavalry (scenario pack) as the "Boeing Jump Bomber". While it is true that Boeing seems to be the manufacturer and Jump Bomber seems to be a description of its purpose, "Boeing Jump Bomber" has been used as the proper name for this aircraft ever since. Most importantly, the BattleTech Master Unit List (MUL) which was released on the CBT forums for beta checking lists this craft under that name. For lack of any other designation, I'd say that is what we should go by. By the way, it seems that there are already several redlinks to that name, so it's also already being used by BTW. Frabby 10:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)