Difference between revisions of "Talk:Inner Sphere 'Mechs"
Sarna News
(→Variant Pages: already had this discussion...) |
m (→Variant Pages: m) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Variant Pages == | == Variant Pages == | ||
: Perhapse we should have BattleMech/Variant sub-pages? especially for something like this. Which ever Mech is published in the TRO would have the text (perhapse via "include"?), and the stats for the main variant would be on the Main page and the subpage for the variant. Humm, should Categories for the TRO's and RS Books be created so that each variant would be added automaticly to the correct book? --[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | : Perhapse we should have BattleMech/Variant sub-pages? especially for something like this. Which ever Mech is published in the TRO would have the text (perhapse via "include"?), and the stats for the main variant would be on the Main page and the subpage for the variant. Humm, should Categories for the TRO's and RS Books be created so that each variant would be added automaticly to the correct book? --[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :At least some of my arguments against that are at [[BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs#Change_format?]]. If you want to discuss changing the format of the 'Mech articles, that talk page is the best place to do it. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | + | ::At least some of my arguments against that are at [[BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs#Change_format?]]. If you want to discuss changing the format of the 'Mech articles, that talk page is the best place to do it. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:25, 29 September 2009
Renaming of 'Mech pages
- CJKeys...good catch. I was wondering what you were doing, but the archived page showed me we had planets I didn't know about. Fine eye for detail. --Revanche 00:05, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Variant Pages
- Perhapse we should have BattleMech/Variant sub-pages? especially for something like this. Which ever Mech is published in the TRO would have the text (perhapse via "include"?), and the stats for the main variant would be on the Main page and the subpage for the variant. Humm, should Categories for the TRO's and RS Books be created so that each variant would be added automaticly to the correct book? --Cameron 13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- At least some of my arguments against that are at BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs#Change_format?. If you want to discuss changing the format of the 'Mech articles, that talk page is the best place to do it. --Scaletail 00:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)