Difference between revisions of "Talk:Niops V"

Line 3: Line 3:
 
== No (pre-Overhaul) Niops categorization ==
 
== No (pre-Overhaul) Niops categorization ==
  
I decided not to create a Niops Association Planets category, as the forthcoming Overhaul would group all thre of these intra-system planets within the same article anyway. As there is only one article at the moment, it seemed less than productive to create a tracking category for it, since it already falls under the Independent Planets category.--[[User:Revanche|Rev]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 15:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
+
I decided not to create a Niops Association Planets category, as the forthcoming Overhaul would group all three of these intra-system planets within the same article anyway. It seemed less than productive to create a tracking category for it, since all three planets fall under the Independent Planets category.--[[User:Revanche|Rev]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 15:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:16, 17 August 2011

This article is within the scope of the Planets WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of planets. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: Planets team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

No (pre-Overhaul) Niops categorization

I decided not to create a Niops Association Planets category, as the forthcoming Overhaul would group all three of these intra-system planets within the same article anyway. It seemed less than productive to create a tracking category for it, since all three planets fall under the Independent Planets category.--Rev (talk|contribs) 15:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)