Difference between revisions of "Talk:Orion IIC"
Sarna News
(resp) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm not an MWO player, but as i understand it, those variants are now considered canon. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:16, 1 March 2016 (PST) | I'm not an MWO player, but as i understand it, those variants are now considered canon. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 21:16, 1 March 2016 (PST) | ||
| − | :Not if you're splitting hairs like I like to do. ;) When you look closely, | + | :Not if you're splitting hairs like I like to do. ;) When you look closely, MWO as such remains an apocryphal source. The (only) thing that was confirmed as canonical was the fluff for the [[Hero 'Mechs]]. No 'Mech configurations outside of what's mentioned in the fluff, and no designs outside the Hero 'Mechs. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 00:41, 2 March 2016 (PST) |
Revision as of 04:42, 2 March 2016
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Canon Variants?
I'm not an MWO player, but as i understand it, those variants are now considered canon. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:16, 1 March 2016 (PST)
- Not if you're splitting hairs like I like to do. ;) When you look closely, MWO as such remains an apocryphal source. The (only) thing that was confirmed as canonical was the fluff for the Hero 'Mechs. No 'Mech configurations outside of what's mentioned in the fluff, and no designs outside the Hero 'Mechs. Frabby (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2016 (PST)