Difference between revisions of "Talk:Record Sheets: 3075 Unabridged"

(Second note)
 
m (Clearing up 2nd Note)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Second note==
 
==Second note==
 
The 2nd note in the Notes section is very unclear to me. If anyone else can decipher it, please do. Otherwise, it is not informative and should be deleted. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 01:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 
The 2nd note in the Notes section is very unclear to me. If anyone else can decipher it, please do. Otherwise, it is not informative and should be deleted. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 01:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
::I'll try to clear this up.  Just recently, a newly printed version of 3075 record sheets came out. Unabridged one has variants of TRO:3075 in it, while the printed version does not.  The note was suppose to explain the difference between the two books.  It partially explaination why these two produces should NOT be merged.  They are related, but differient enough warrent seperate entry. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 01:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:36, 28 March 2010

Second note

The 2nd note in the Notes section is very unclear to me. If anyone else can decipher it, please do. Otherwise, it is not informative and should be deleted. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 01:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll try to clear this up. Just recently, a newly printed version of 3075 record sheets came out. Unabridged one has variants of TRO:3075 in it, while the printed version does not. The note was suppose to explain the difference between the two books. It partially explaination why these two produces should NOT be merged. They are related, but differient enough warrent seperate entry. -- Wrangler 01:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)