Difference between revisions of "Talk:Warhammer"
Sarna News
m (Too Many Images) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Has anyone else noticed the similarities between the illustration of the WHM-6R and the Destroid Tomahawk of Robotech fame? [http://www.robotech.com/infopedia/mecha/viewmecha.php?id=17] --[[User:OneUseOnly|OneUseOnly]] 16:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | Has anyone else noticed the similarities between the illustration of the WHM-6R and the Destroid Tomahawk of Robotech fame? [http://www.robotech.com/infopedia/mecha/viewmecha.php?id=17] --[[User:OneUseOnly|OneUseOnly]] 16:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Thats because they own the copy right of the original imagine of the Tomahawk Destroid. FASA got the their license for Macross Mech from same "company" as Harmony Gold. Thus, they are one in the same 'Mech. I'm not sure if their allow to use exact picture done FASA itself, but they can use the imagines. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 17:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ::Thats because they own the copy right of the original imagine of the Tomahawk Destroid. FASA got the their license for Macross Mech from same "company" as Harmony Gold. Thus, they are one in the same 'Mech. I'm not sure if their allow to use exact picture done FASA itself, but they can use the imagines. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 17:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Too Many Images== | ||
| + | IMO there are too many images on this article, too cluttered, too messy, crowding out the text which is the reason for its existence. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 10:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:37, 7 March 2010
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Contents
Project Phoenix Models
There isnt any need to list the PP models seperately from the other models as they are all varaints of the Warhammer. I changed the page back to the proper format.--CJKeys 21:11, 30 November 2006 (CST)
WHM-6D irregularities
This diff. strikes me as odd, it seems that neither the original nor the altered version are correct. Isn't the WHM-6D a 2x PPC, 2x ML, 2x SL variant? (Source: TRO of the WHM-6R and it's variants, from Solaris 7) As always, I'll bow to other's superior knowledge to canon 'Mechs. --Xoid 01:12, 24 January 2007 (CST)
- Checked it through HMP, dont know how I missed that. --CJKeys 09:05, 24 January 2007 (CST)
- Heh, don't worry. When you do enough of any one thing you'll eventually slip up. I've made thousands of templates yet I can still mung them up with the best of 'em. ;-) --Xoid 20:30, 26 January 2007 (CST)
Dual Cockpit variant
Where does this come from? I don't know of any canon variants of this dual cockpit variant. -- Wrangler 01:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- MechWarrior Companion pg 52. Pretty much the bulk of the Dual Cockpit page on BTW comes from the Companion. Cyc 13:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Similar imagines of Robotech/Battletech Mechs
Has anyone else noticed the similarities between the illustration of the WHM-6R and the Destroid Tomahawk of Robotech fame? [1] --OneUseOnly 16:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thats because they own the copy right of the original imagine of the Tomahawk Destroid. FASA got the their license for Macross Mech from same "company" as Harmony Gold. Thus, they are one in the same 'Mech. I'm not sure if their allow to use exact picture done FASA itself, but they can use the imagines. -- Wrangler 17:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Too Many Images
IMO there are too many images on this article, too cluttered, too messy, crowding out the text which is the reason for its existence. Cyc 10:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)