Difference between revisions of "Template:External News"

(+16 May)
(+18May)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
*18 May 2011: '''Fanon Definition''' ([[User:Revanche|Revanche]])
 +
:The proposal to remove fan-created content ('fanon') from BTW has [[Policy_Talk:Fanon#Discussion_2|passed]]. The policy process has now moved into discussion of the definition of 'fanon', as it pertains to this site. All BTW writers, editors and users are welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion [[Policy_Talk:Fanon#Step_1:_Fanon_definition|here]].
 +
 +
 
*16 May 2011: '''13,000th article!''' ([[User:Revanche|Revanche]])
 
*16 May 2011: '''13,000th article!''' ([[User:Revanche|Revanche]])
 
:BTW Writer [[User:CungrVanck|CungrVanck]] has written the project's milestone 13,000th article, [[Odessan Raxx]] (with an assist by [[User:Siberian-troll|Siberian-troll]]).
 
:BTW Writer [[User:CungrVanck|CungrVanck]] has written the project's milestone 13,000th article, [[Odessan Raxx]] (with an assist by [[User:Siberian-troll|Siberian-troll]]).

Revision as of 10:24, 18 May 2011

  • 18 May 2011: Fanon Definition (Revanche)
The proposal to remove fan-created content ('fanon') from BTW has passed. The policy process has now moved into discussion of the definition of 'fanon', as it pertains to this site. All BTW writers, editors and users are welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion here.


  • 16 May 2011: 13,000th article! (Revanche)
BTW Writer CungrVanck has written the project's milestone 13,000th article, Odessan Raxx (with an assist by Siberian-troll).


  • 28 April 2011: The loss of an Artist (Revanche)
The BattleTechWiki community mourns the passing and celebrates the myriad works of renowned artist Doug Chaffee.


Founder Nic Jansma has authorized a discussion on policy regarding the separating of canon & official articles on BattleTechWiki from fan-created content ('fanon'). If there is overwhelming support for such a policy, fanon would be moved to the BT Fanon Wikia.
All BTW writers, editors and users are welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion in the discussion.