Difference between revisions of "Template talk:InfoBoxASF"
Sarna News
(Created page with "==Armor type== Is there a reason the ASF template doesn't include a field for the armor brand and type, while other units like BattleMechs and Combat Vehicles do? ~~~~") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Armor type== | ==Armor type== | ||
Is there a reason the ASF template doesn't include a field for the armor brand and type, while other units like BattleMechs and Combat Vehicles do? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:36, 29 August 2013 (PDT) | Is there a reason the ASF template doesn't include a field for the armor brand and type, while other units like BattleMechs and Combat Vehicles do? [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 12:36, 29 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | :I think it was forgotten, will you update the infobox.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:48, 29 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::OK, it's done, I think. I've made it an optional field, so it doesn't appear in entries if there's no data in it - that seemed a better option than having the empty field suddenly appear on all the existing articles. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 13:12, 29 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:12, 29 August 2013
Armor type[edit]
Is there a reason the ASF template doesn't include a field for the armor brand and type, while other units like BattleMechs and Combat Vehicles do? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2013 (PDT)
- I think it was forgotten, will you update the infobox.--Doneve (talk) 12:48, 29 August 2013 (PDT)
- OK, it's done, I think. I've made it an optional field, so it doesn't appear in entries if there's no data in it - that seemed a better option than having the empty field suddenly appear on all the existing articles. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2013 (PDT)