Difference between revisions of "Template talk:InfoboxWar"
Sarna News
(Created page with "==InfoBoxConflict== I take it this is the prototype, and once it works as imagined will be renamed InfoBoxConflic to replace that one? Because we definitely don't need two suc...") |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==InfoBoxConflict== | ==InfoBoxConflict== | ||
I take it this is the prototype, and once it works as imagined will be renamed InfoBoxConflic to replace that one? Because we definitely don't need two such infoboxes. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 07:41, 30 October 2012 (PDT) | I take it this is the prototype, and once it works as imagined will be renamed InfoBoxConflic to replace that one? Because we definitely don't need two such infoboxes. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 07:41, 30 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | :you are correct, sir.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 03:48, 31 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==The Plan== | ||
| + | My plan is to get this one up and running the way we want, then just replacing the existing template with the updated content. I do '''NOT''' plan on duplicating work by having two infobox templates for battles/wars. That's just a maintenance nightmare. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On another note I'm not sure I see the point of the images at the top of the infobox, but I'll look into it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, adding faction icons is possible but a lot more complicated than I thought. (Turns out the two/three column layout stuff is much easier.)--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:56, 31 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:56, 31 October 2012
InfoBoxConflict[edit]
I take it this is the prototype, and once it works as imagined will be renamed InfoBoxConflic to replace that one? Because we definitely don't need two such infoboxes. Frabby (talk) 07:41, 30 October 2012 (PDT)
The Plan[edit]
My plan is to get this one up and running the way we want, then just replacing the existing template with the updated content. I do NOT plan on duplicating work by having two infobox templates for battles/wars. That's just a maintenance nightmare.
On another note I'm not sure I see the point of the images at the top of the infobox, but I'll look into it.
Also, adding faction icons is possible but a lot more complicated than I thought. (Turns out the two/three column layout stuff is much easier.)--Mbear(talk) 06:56, 31 October 2012 (PDT)