Difference between revisions of "User talk:99.189.28.19"
(Welcome) |
(→Recent Edit Summary: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Welcome}} | {{Welcome}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Recent Edit Summary == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Good morning, 99.189.28.19. I want to thank you for the corrections you made to [[Thunder Fox]]. <br> | ||
+ | On BTW, we have adopted the [[BattleTechWiki:Five pillars|Five Pillars]] as a statement towards how we (all of us) will be building this open and free BattleTech encyclopedia. One of these tenants regards our code of conduct, to include using sincere and friendly language to correct where needed and encourage always. One of the best ways to correct someone else's actions is to respond on their specific talk page, rather than the edit summary (which remains an omnidirectional method not likely to find the intended person). You can find the Editor you're seeking by reviewing the article's history tab and then informing him or her of the existence of auto-spellcheckers in browsers. (I suspect, however, in this case you may be dealing with an Editor who does not have the option of upgrading above IE6.) <br> | ||
+ | I hope this helps you alleviate some of your frustration regarding spelling and also hope to see more activity on your part in the future.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 13:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:44, 18 January 2010
Welcome[edit]
Recent Edit Summary[edit]
Good morning, 99.189.28.19. I want to thank you for the corrections you made to Thunder Fox.
On BTW, we have adopted the Five Pillars as a statement towards how we (all of us) will be building this open and free BattleTech encyclopedia. One of these tenants regards our code of conduct, to include using sincere and friendly language to correct where needed and encourage always. One of the best ways to correct someone else's actions is to respond on their specific talk page, rather than the edit summary (which remains an omnidirectional method not likely to find the intended person). You can find the Editor you're seeking by reviewing the article's history tab and then informing him or her of the existence of auto-spellcheckers in browsers. (I suspect, however, in this case you may be dealing with an Editor who does not have the option of upgrading above IE6.)
I hope this helps you alleviate some of your frustration regarding spelling and also hope to see more activity on your part in the future.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 13:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)