Difference between revisions of "User talk:Akashi"
m |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Scenario Pack== | ==Scenario Pack== | ||
Hy, is [Scenario Pack: The Battle of Addicks] a canon source or fanon? I can't found any info from the scenario pack, can you help me, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:39, 17 April 2013 (PDT) | Hy, is [Scenario Pack: The Battle of Addicks] a canon source or fanon? I can't found any info from the scenario pack, can you help me, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:39, 17 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
− | |||
− | + | ==Take a look== | |
+ | Hy again, i think this interest you, take a look on this link [http://bg.battletech.com/?page_id=27], there two great big MW:Dark Age pdf's free to download on the bottom of the page, i feel this help's a lot on your work.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:40, 17 April 2013 (PDT) |
Revision as of 16:40, 17 April 2013
Good Edits
Hy Akashi, very very good update of Katana Tormark and other DA articles, i don't love the DA era but i appriciate good edits on some articles there pooking around the Dark Age era to bring this up to snuff, with best regards.--Doneve (talk) 23:01, 15 April 2013 (PDT)
- Thank you! I've just discovered the DA myself (my usual focus being the ~3050s), but what little I read so far (and even this occurred only because I am committed to hunting down any piece of info about the Combine) was more interesting than I had expected, and prompted me to at least take care of the Dragon's Fury. :) --Akashi (talk) 10:26, 16 April 2013 (PDT)
Scenario Pack
Hy, is [Scenario Pack: The Battle of Addicks] a canon source or fanon? I can't found any info from the scenario pack, can you help me, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 12:39, 17 April 2013 (PDT)
Take a look
Hy again, i think this interest you, take a look on this link [1], there two great big MW:Dark Age pdf's free to download on the bottom of the page, i feel this help's a lot on your work.--Doneve (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2013 (PDT)