Difference between revisions of "User talk:Akashi"
Sarna News
m |
m (doh edit conflict restore Akashi's talk) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Scenario Pack== | ==Scenario Pack== | ||
| − | Hy, is [Scenario Pack: The Battle of Addicks] a canon source or fanon? I can't found any info from the scenario pack, can you help me, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:39, 17 April 2013 (PDT) | + | Hy, is [Scenario Pack: The Battle of Addicks] a canon source or fanon? I can't found any info from the scenario pack, can you help me, thanks.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 12:39, 17 April 2013 (PDT) |
| + | : It looks canon to me - this is where I stumbled over it, pure coincidence and a lucky hit on google: http://sarna.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/products/mwda/scenarios/addicks.pdf <br>[http://www.dropshipcommand.com/forum/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=19&topic_id=927&mode=full Apparently the document was also available on the WizKids website for some time], but is not anymore. | ||
| + | :The conflict itself is referenced in some dossiers such as [http://sarna.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/mwda_dossiers/death_from_above_13.pdf Death from Above 13] as well as [http://www.darkagepress.com/INN-INNWarTouchesAddicks11-03-3132.html the backup site] for WizKids INN articles. Please let me know if there are any problems with these sources! --[[User:Akashi|Akashi]] ([[User talk:Akashi|talk]]) 13:38, 17 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
==Take a look== | ==Take a look== | ||
Hy again, i think this interest you, take a look on this link [http://bg.battletech.com/?page_id=27], there two great big MW:Dark Age pdf's free to download on the bottom of the page, i feel this help's a lot on your work.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:40, 17 April 2013 (PDT) | Hy again, i think this interest you, take a look on this link [http://bg.battletech.com/?page_id=27], there two great big MW:Dark Age pdf's free to download on the bottom of the page, i feel this help's a lot on your work.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 13:40, 17 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 17 April 2013
Good Edits
Hy Akashi, very very good update of Katana Tormark and other DA articles, i don't love the DA era but i appriciate good edits on some articles there pooking around the Dark Age era to bring this up to snuff, with best regards.--Doneve (talk) 23:01, 15 April 2013 (PDT)
- Thank you! I've just discovered the DA myself (my usual focus being the ~3050s), but what little I read so far (and even this occurred only because I am committed to hunting down any piece of info about the Combine) was more interesting than I had expected, and prompted me to at least take care of the Dragon's Fury. :) --Akashi (talk) 10:26, 16 April 2013 (PDT)
Scenario Pack
Hy, is [Scenario Pack: The Battle of Addicks] a canon source or fanon? I can't found any info from the scenario pack, can you help me, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 12:39, 17 April 2013 (PDT)
- It looks canon to me - this is where I stumbled over it, pure coincidence and a lucky hit on google: http://sarna.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/products/mwda/scenarios/addicks.pdf
Apparently the document was also available on the WizKids website for some time, but is not anymore. - The conflict itself is referenced in some dossiers such as Death from Above 13 as well as the backup site for WizKids INN articles. Please let me know if there are any problems with these sources! --Akashi (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2013 (PDT)
Take a look
Hy again, i think this interest you, take a look on this link [1], there two great big MW:Dark Age pdf's free to download on the bottom of the page, i feel this help's a lot on your work.--Doneve (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2013 (PDT)