Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Standard BattleMechs"
Sarna News
m (→Deletion?) |
m (→Deletion?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
That said, I do feel that this category should only hold other categories: [[Akuma]] is both under this category and [[:Category:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs]]. That's redundant, and if there is a consensus backing it, I am willing to volunteer my time to removing the redundant categories. If we find any little exceptions that don't quite fit either we can worry about that later.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 10:59, 21 June 2022 (EDT) | That said, I do feel that this category should only hold other categories: [[Akuma]] is both under this category and [[:Category:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs]]. That's redundant, and if there is a consensus backing it, I am willing to volunteer my time to removing the redundant categories. If we find any little exceptions that don't quite fit either we can worry about that later.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 10:59, 21 June 2022 (EDT) | ||
| − | : I think the fact that it's been "under discussion" for 4 years—with no discussion—allows you to remove the tag. As for making it a meta category, I strongly recommend you reach out to Dmon, as he's a big proponent (& engine) of meta categories | + | : I think the fact that it's been "under discussion" for 4 years—with no discussion—allows you to remove the tag. As for making it a meta category, I strongly recommend you reach out to Dmon, as he's a big proponent (& engine) of meta categories.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 16:32, 22 June 2022 (EDT) |
::[[:Category talk:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs]] kinda blew up, and I am working on bringing these disparate conversations to [[BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs]]. Please stand by. :) --[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 16:35, 22 June 2022 (EDT) | ::[[:Category talk:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs]] kinda blew up, and I am working on bringing these disparate conversations to [[BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs]]. Please stand by. :) --[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 16:35, 22 June 2022 (EDT) | ||
:::Let's move this over to [[BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs]] as it is part of a much larger debate.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 19:21, 22 June 2022 (EDT) | :::Let's move this over to [[BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs]] as it is part of a much larger debate.--[[User:Talvin|Talvin]] ([[User talk:Talvin|talk]]) 19:21, 22 June 2022 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:58, 23 June 2022
Deletion?[edit]
Both categories under this one are also marked for deletion, and there has been some pushback over the last couple years on that point. I am not seeing a strong consensus for deletion, I am seeing a consistent dislike of the idea. I vote no on deletion.
That said, I do feel that this category should only hold other categories: Akuma is both under this category and Category:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs. That's redundant, and if there is a consensus backing it, I am willing to volunteer my time to removing the redundant categories. If we find any little exceptions that don't quite fit either we can worry about that later.--Talvin (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2022 (EDT)
- I think the fact that it's been "under discussion" for 4 years—with no discussion—allows you to remove the tag. As for making it a meta category, I strongly recommend you reach out to Dmon, as he's a big proponent (& engine) of meta categories.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 16:32, 22 June 2022 (EDT)
- Category talk:Inner Sphere Standard BattleMechs kinda blew up, and I am working on bringing these disparate conversations to BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs. Please stand by. :) --Talvin (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2022 (EDT)
- Let's move this over to BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs as it is part of a much larger debate.--Talvin (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2022 (EDT)