Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Video Games"
Sarna News
(Created page with '==Housekeeping== we have lots of articles in the Video Game Category but most of them seem a bit random and lack any kind of real article. {eg Crescent Hawks Inception & [[Cr…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Housekeeping== | ==Housekeeping== | ||
| − | we have lots of articles in the Video Game Category but most of them seem a bit random and lack any kind of real article. {eg [[Crescent Hawks Inception]] & [[Crescent Hawks Inception/ | + | we have lots of articles in the Video Game Category but most of them seem a bit random and lack any kind of real article. {eg [[Crescent Hawks Inception]], [[Crescent Hawks Inception/Hacking Guide]], [[Crescent Hawks Inception/Strategy Guide 1]] & [[Crescent Hawks Inception/Strategy Guide 2]]. I propose that each Video game gets proper article just like any other article and a section at the bottom called RESOURCES much like we do now but instead of a list of links and downloads we have a wikilink to an article containing all the downloads, strategy guides and other more OOC technical stuff (eg [[Cresent Hawks Inception/Resources]]). This way each game would have a simple two pages rather than the multiple pages some have. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 17:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:40, 6 August 2009
Housekeeping
we have lots of articles in the Video Game Category but most of them seem a bit random and lack any kind of real article. {eg Crescent Hawks Inception, Crescent Hawks Inception/Hacking Guide, Crescent Hawks Inception/Strategy Guide 1 & Crescent Hawks Inception/Strategy Guide 2. I propose that each Video game gets proper article just like any other article and a section at the bottom called RESOURCES much like we do now but instead of a list of links and downloads we have a wikilink to an article containing all the downloads, strategy guides and other more OOC technical stuff (eg Cresent Hawks Inception/Resources). This way each game would have a simple two pages rather than the multiple pages some have. --Dmon 17:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)