Difference between revisions of "Talk:2nd Republican Guards"
m (Clean up/respon) |
(→Cleanup: Resp) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This page needs a good solid review of articles (a, an, the, etc.), as well as exisiting capitalizations. On the plus side, it has good solid information on the unit. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 16:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | This page needs a good solid review of articles (a, an, the, etc.), as well as exisiting capitalizations. On the plus side, it has good solid information on the unit. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 16:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :Hello Rev, I did extensive research on this unit. Each piece of information as solid as granite. I realize my spelling and grammer is something to be desired, however i'm not sure why you feel the unit's information isn't solid. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 19:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |
+ | ::Wrangler, read it again. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:43, 21 January 2010
Cleanup
This page needs a good solid review of articles (a, an, the, etc.), as well as exisiting capitalizations. On the plus side, it has good solid information on the unit. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 16:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Rev, I did extensive research on this unit. Each piece of information as solid as granite. I realize my spelling and grammer is something to be desired, however i'm not sure why you feel the unit's information isn't solid. -- Wrangler 19:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)