Difference between revisions of "Talk:7th FedCom RCT"
(grammar) |
m (Break up FCCW references) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Grammar. It's a lot better than I thought it was when I was bleary-eyed last night. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | :Grammar. It's a lot better than I thought it was when I was bleary-eyed last night. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::If I might make a suggestion, beyond more tagging, probably break up the [[FedCom Civil War (sourcebook)]] references. Provide a separate ref tag for each page/group of pages, you've clearly noted the pages, and its why the ref tag you've got was named FCCW1, because it was the first mention/page of the [[8th FedCom RCT]] in the book and so on. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 00:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:02, 9 July 2009
Can I ask whats wrong with it? I'm now working on the 5th Fedcom and want to know so improvements can be incoporated.— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by Stormlion1 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 8 July 2009.
Testing, Testing, 1,2,3 Stormlion1 04:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Grammar. It's a lot better than I thought it was when I was bleary-eyed last night. --Scaletail 23:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- If I might make a suggestion, beyond more tagging, probably break up the FedCom Civil War (sourcebook) references. Provide a separate ref tag for each page/group of pages, you've clearly noted the pages, and its why the ref tag you've got was named FCCW1, because it was the first mention/page of the 8th FedCom RCT in the book and so on. Cyc 00:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)