Difference between revisions of "Talk:9th Illician Rangers"
(→Effectiveness percentages are weird.: new section) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:06, 14 September 2021 (EDT) | Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:06, 14 September 2021 (EDT) | ||
+ | :I would think they should be expressed as 41% and 63% normally, so I am not sure why anybody would do it the way it has been done.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:07, 14 September 2021 (EDT) |
Revision as of 12:07, 14 September 2021
Effectiveness percentages are weird.
In the Composition section, we have weird percentages. Should the boldfaced numbers be converted to 41% and 63%?
2786 - 2821
9th Rangers (Regiment/Regular/Reliable) Note: At this point in time the medium-weight unit was stationed on Algorab. In 2821 the command was reduced to 0,40999999999999998 percent of its strength and was deployed on Kalidasa. [2]
2830
9th Rangers (Regiment/Veteran/Reliable) [3] Note: At this point in time the medium-weight unit was stationed on Kalidasa with an operational readiness of 0,63 percent.