Sarna News: Bad 'Mechs - Icestorm

Difference between revisions of "Talk:9th Illician Rangers"

Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:06, 14 September 2021 (EDT)
 
Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 11:06, 14 September 2021 (EDT)
 +
:I would think they should be expressed as 41% and 63% normally, so I am not sure why anybody would do it the way it has been done.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 12:07, 14 September 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:07, 14 September 2021

This article is within the scope of the Military Commands WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of articles on military units. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: Military Commands team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

Effectiveness percentages are weird.

In the Composition section, we have weird percentages. Should the boldfaced numbers be converted to 41% and 63%?

2786 - 2821

9th Rangers (Regiment/Regular/Reliable) Note: At this point in time the medium-weight unit was stationed on Algorab. In 2821 the command was reduced to 0,40999999999999998 percent of its strength and was deployed on Kalidasa. [2]

2830

9th Rangers (Regiment/Veteran/Reliable) [3] Note: At this point in time the medium-weight unit was stationed on Kalidasa with an operational readiness of 0,63 percent.

Thanks!--Mbear(talk) 11:06, 14 September 2021 (EDT)

I would think they should be expressed as 41% and 63% normally, so I am not sure why anybody would do it the way it has been done.--Dmon (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2021 (EDT)