Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha Strike (tactic)"
Sarna News
(→Raison de etre: okay!) |
(→Raison de etre: Yupper) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I envisage the dictionary a 'one-stop shop', there to give a quick grounding in the subject, and nothing more. When it comes down to tactics, I'm sure there is more than enough there for an actual article. Mayhap a single article, discussing each type of tactic, then (if necessary) a seperate one for each in further detail. I'll try to explain this better, latter if you're not getting where I'm coming from. --[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 23:48, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | :I envisage the dictionary a 'one-stop shop', there to give a quick grounding in the subject, and nothing more. When it comes down to tactics, I'm sure there is more than enough there for an actual article. Mayhap a single article, discussing each type of tactic, then (if necessary) a seperate one for each in further detail. I'll try to explain this better, latter if you're not getting where I'm coming from. --[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 23:48, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Actually, I like that idea. [[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 16:47, 25 October 2007 (CDT) | ::Actually, I like that idea. [[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 16:47, 25 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::I think the idea is great. We could easily provide a general "Tactics" page with other articles that are broken out to discuss complex ideas more in-depth (using the Main tag). Sounds like a plan! [[User:Bdevoe|Bdevoe]] 16:49, 25 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 25 October 2007
Raison de etre
When I linked to this article, I envisioned it as one article in, let's say, Category:BattleTech tactics. It could be accompanied by volley fire and whatever else people want to contribute. Perhaps both of those articles would be better served in the Dictionary. I have no real preference, but both need something. Scaletail 17:41, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- I envisage the dictionary a 'one-stop shop', there to give a quick grounding in the subject, and nothing more. When it comes down to tactics, I'm sure there is more than enough there for an actual article. Mayhap a single article, discussing each type of tactic, then (if necessary) a seperate one for each in further detail. I'll try to explain this better, latter if you're not getting where I'm coming from. --Xoid 23:48, 23 October 2007 (CDT)