Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armor"

(agreed)
(Comment)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
While valid descriptor, problem is that apart from calling tanks armor we also have the stuff said tanks are clad in: [[:Category:Armor]]. Better to convert this to a disambig with links to the armor category and combat vehicle page. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 00:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 
While valid descriptor, problem is that apart from calling tanks armor we also have the stuff said tanks are clad in: [[:Category:Armor]]. Better to convert this to a disambig with links to the armor category and combat vehicle page. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 00:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:I agree. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:I agree. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
::I agree as well. I apologise for not setting Disambig earlier.  I'm still slowly learning wikipedia code. Disambig is one of things I'm unable to do on my own. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:26, 1 September 2009

Disambig

While valid descriptor, problem is that apart from calling tanks armor we also have the stuff said tanks are clad in: Category:Armor. Better to convert this to a disambig with links to the armor category and combat vehicle page. Cyc 00:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree. --Scaletail 01:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I agree as well. I apologise for not setting Disambig earlier. I'm still slowly learning wikipedia code. Disambig is one of things I'm unable to do on my own. -- Wrangler 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)