Difference between revisions of "Talk:Artillery"

m (Proposed Merge.)
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Merge?==
 
==Merge?==
 
The content of the [[Artillery Weapons]] page looks like it would fit into this page's overview section very well. Any thoughts?--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 18:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 
The content of the [[Artillery Weapons]] page looks like it would fit into this page's overview section very well. Any thoughts?--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 18:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Agreed, though Artillery Weapons needs some citations. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 +
::Also agree.  It would make more sense to only have the one page labeled as "Artillery Weapons" I think, as "Artillery" is almost too broad of a term to be used in a Battletech wiki.
 +
:::Have created a redirect. Imho, "artillery" is the better article name. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 06:44, 3 March 2013 (PST)

Latest revision as of 10:44, 3 March 2013

Merge?[edit]

The content of the Artillery Weapons page looks like it would fit into this page's overview section very well. Any thoughts?--Mbear 18:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Agreed, though Artillery Weapons needs some citations. --Scaletail 23:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Also agree. It would make more sense to only have the one page labeled as "Artillery Weapons" I think, as "Artillery" is almost too broad of a term to be used in a Battletech wiki.
Have created a redirect. Imho, "artillery" is the better article name. Frabby (talk) 06:44, 3 March 2013 (PST)