Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beagle Active Probe"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::I did add it. I can remove it if needed. What I put obviously wasn't copied verbatim from any of the books. I think my reasoning was that under weapons, it specifically lists all the stats. So it seemed reasonable that we'd do the same for the equipment. Does that sound right? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | ::::I did add it. I can remove it if needed. What I put obviously wasn't copied verbatim from any of the books. I think my reasoning was that under weapons, it specifically lists all the stats. So it seemed reasonable that we'd do the same for the equipment. Does that sound right? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :::::I made the change I referenced, as a demo. But, you highlighted a precedence I think is valid. Are infoboxes in-universe, in-game or both? I don't know. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:36, 18 February 2010
Beacon Active Probe Rules Question
Question : Shouldn't it be standard to include the actual rules for this equipment? I wanted to ask before I added it myself. ClanWolverine101
- I would be be bold. Look at some of the other equipment that listing on the site. Just remember were trying not to replace the TechManual or anything like that. - Wrangler 22:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! ClanWolverine101
- if it is not too late, I'd like to add, yes, discussions of the rules are allowed, but in a separate section labeled Game Rules. No in-universe material should follow such a section. But, as Wrangler stated, we don't want to provide the same level of detail as the rule books. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 01:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- I did add it. I can remove it if needed. What I put obviously wasn't copied verbatim from any of the books. I think my reasoning was that under weapons, it specifically lists all the stats. So it seemed reasonable that we'd do the same for the equipment. Does that sound right? ClanWolverine101