Difference between revisions of "Talk:Brion's Legion, 1st Regiment"

(Created page with 'I disagree to merge the article into one again, because smaller units with less content have their one article to and in the FM Manualthey are also considered as 2 seperate units…')
 
(Merge)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I disagree to merge the article into one again, because smaller units with less content have their one article to and in the FM Manualthey are also considered as 2 seperate units. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 17:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
+
I disagree to merge the article into one again, because smaller units with less content have their one article to and in the FM Manual they are also considered as 2 seperate units. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 17:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
:But there's nothing here that isn't already on [[Brion's Legion]]. There's no new content here, so I cannot imagine why this article should exist. What has changed since the last time we came to a consensus about this article? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
::I agree with Scaletail. The article doesn't really add anything to the site as far as I can see. All this data is in the main Brion's Legion article. If you want to add the unit logo, use a Gallery tag.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 01:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
:::I will show you that it is worth to have to seperate regiment articles. I will add today additional content. Please let me do my work and make later a decicion. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
::::Almost all of the information in this article is presented more fully in [[Brion's Legion]]. The only addition has been a mite of information about the regiment during the Jihad, which can easily be merged into Brion's Legion. I do not see a reason for this article to exist as almost all of the information is simply duplicated from that article, so I formally propose a merger. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 15:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:31, 6 March 2011

I disagree to merge the article into one again, because smaller units with less content have their one article to and in the FM Manual they are also considered as 2 seperate units. Neuling 17:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

But there's nothing here that isn't already on Brion's Legion. There's no new content here, so I cannot imagine why this article should exist. What has changed since the last time we came to a consensus about this article? --Scaletail 01:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
I agree with Scaletail. The article doesn't really add anything to the site as far as I can see. All this data is in the main Brion's Legion article. If you want to add the unit logo, use a Gallery tag.--Mbear 01:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
I will show you that it is worth to have to seperate regiment articles. I will add today additional content. Please let me do my work and make later a decicion. Neuling 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Almost all of the information in this article is presented more fully in Brion's Legion. The only addition has been a mite of information about the regiment during the Jihad, which can easily be merged into Brion's Legion. I do not see a reason for this article to exist as almost all of the information is simply duplicated from that article, so I formally propose a merger. --Scaletail 15:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)