Difference between revisions of "Talk:Katherine Steiner-Davion"

Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Characters}}
+
==Legacy section==
{{WikiProject UnfinishedBook|tr=new}}
 
 
 
 
Will9761 edits: I'm not sure that they add to the article, as they restate most of the previous information. I may have some issues with the "completely neutral" idea of articles (I believe some unique cultural words or flavor can be added without affecting the impartial stance of the article), but will9761's edits seem too far biased. I don't want to unilaterally revert and I also don't know if others agree. [[User:Ocherstone|Ocherstone]] ([[User talk:Ocherstone|talk]]) 11:24, 14 December 2023 (EST)
 
Will9761 edits: I'm not sure that they add to the article, as they restate most of the previous information. I may have some issues with the "completely neutral" idea of articles (I believe some unique cultural words or flavor can be added without affecting the impartial stance of the article), but will9761's edits seem too far biased. I don't want to unilaterally revert and I also don't know if others agree. [[User:Ocherstone|Ocherstone]] ([[User talk:Ocherstone|talk]]) 11:24, 14 December 2023 (EST)
 +
:I was actually thinking exactly the same thing, but I was not sure if I was being harsh so did not roll it back. I have now rolled it back because if I am honest, Legacy sections in character articles are something I am yet to find a single worthwhile example of.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 11:34, 14 December 2023 (EST)

Revision as of 12:34, 14 December 2023

Legacy section

Will9761 edits: I'm not sure that they add to the article, as they restate most of the previous information. I may have some issues with the "completely neutral" idea of articles (I believe some unique cultural words or flavor can be added without affecting the impartial stance of the article), but will9761's edits seem too far biased. I don't want to unilaterally revert and I also don't know if others agree. Ocherstone (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2023 (EST)

I was actually thinking exactly the same thing, but I was not sure if I was being harsh so did not roll it back. I have now rolled it back because if I am honest, Legacy sections in character articles are something I am yet to find a single worthwhile example of.--Dmon (talk) 11:34, 14 December 2023 (EST)