Difference between revisions of "Talk:Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade (Complete)"
Sarna News
(Discussion start) |
BobTheZombie (talk | contribs) m (resp) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Rename? == | == Rename? == | ||
Should we rename the article to the name on the cover? So no "Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade (Complete)" but "Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade Complete". [[User:BigDuke66|BigDuke66]] ([[User talk:BigDuke66|talk]]) 08:02, 17 February 2014 (PST) | Should we rename the article to the name on the cover? So no "Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade (Complete)" but "Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade Complete". [[User:BigDuke66|BigDuke66]] ([[User talk:BigDuke66|talk]]) 08:02, 17 February 2014 (PST) | ||
| + | :That makes sense, as I too dislike the overuse of parenthesis in titles; on the other hand, I am by no means an expert on the record sheets. You might as well move it (remember to [[Policy:Be Bold|be bold]]), and it can always be easily undone if needed. -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 10:21, 17 February 2014 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:21, 17 February 2014
Rename?[edit]
Should we rename the article to the name on the cover? So no "Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade (Complete)" but "Record Sheets: Phoenix Upgrade Complete". BigDuke66 (talk) 08:02, 17 February 2014 (PST)
- That makes sense, as I too dislike the overuse of parenthesis in titles; on the other hand, I am by no means an expert on the record sheets. You might as well move it (remember to be bold), and it can always be easily undone if needed. -BobTheZombie (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2014 (PST)