Difference between revisions of "Talk:Technical Readout 3028"
Sarna News
m (unsigned post) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Highlander== | ==Highlander== | ||
| − | Happy to add a different camo scheme for the Highlander - anyone know of a unit that has one at this time period? | + | Happy to add a different camo scheme for the Highlander - anyone know of a unit that has one at this time period? [[User:Justin_Kase|Justin_Kase]] ([[User Justin_Kase|talk]]) 08:34, 23 November 2016 (PST) |
:I'm drawing a blank here. Something in the back of my mind says it was associated with House Liao, but generally the ''Highlander'' is not exactly a 3025 era posterchild... [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 22:20, 23 November 2016 (PST) | :I'm drawing a blank here. Something in the back of my mind says it was associated with House Liao, but generally the ''Highlander'' is not exactly a 3025 era posterchild... [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 22:20, 23 November 2016 (PST) | ||
| − | ::Quite correct, the ''Highlander'' first became a Capellan manufactured design (under license) with [[Technical Readout: 3025 Revised]] thanks to the Unseen removals, [[Technical Readout: 3039]] expanding on these Capellan rebuilt models. That said, no Capellan line units circa 3028 are noted as being ''Highlander'' users, but [[Combat Manual: Mercenaries]] has at least two merc units (with Capellan ties no less) who are confirmed as having/preserving ''Highlander''s during the late Succession Wars - the [[15th Dracon]]s and the [[Northwind Highlanders]].[[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 01:26, 24 November 2016 (PST) | + | ::Quite correct, the ''Highlander'' first became a Capellan manufactured design (under license) with [[Technical Readout: 3025 Revised]] thanks to the Unseen removals, [[Technical Readout: 3039]] expanding on these Capellan rebuilt models. That said, no Capellan line units circa 3028 are noted as being ''Highlander'' users, but [[Combat Manual: Mercenaries]] has at least two merc units (with Capellan ties no less) who are confirmed as having/preserving ''Highlander''s during the late Succession Wars - the [[15th Dracon]]s and the [[Northwind Highlanders]].[[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 01:26, 24 November 2016 (PST) |
| + | :::Thank you both! I will work up a camo spec for one of them, likely the [[15th Dracon]], seeing as I had never heard of them before and it will help to expose people to another cool new unit. Hopefully, the new model that PGI releases in December will make for a Gray Death Legion mech (or be a good swap out for another that can then be GDL). That should fix that anachronism :) [[User:Justin_Kase|Justin_Kase]] ([[User Justin_Kase|talk]]) 07:05, 24 November 2016 (PST) | ||
==Non-Canon, Fan made products should not be on server== | ==Non-Canon, Fan made products should not be on server== | ||
Hi. I'm totally against this being on the server. We went though a purge years ago to remove this so Sarna would stand out being source of canon or at least non-fan made materials. Why is this here? [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 18:30, 23 November 2016 (PST) | Hi. I'm totally against this being on the server. We went though a purge years ago to remove this so Sarna would stand out being source of canon or at least non-fan made materials. Why is this here? [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 18:30, 23 November 2016 (PST) | ||
:It isn't. This is just an article about it (which is in line with [[Policy:Fanon]], as it's a sufficiently high-profile product), and like in other such articles it includes a download link. All good. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 22:20, 23 November 2016 (PST) | :It isn't. This is just an article about it (which is in line with [[Policy:Fanon]], as it's a sufficiently high-profile product), and like in other such articles it includes a download link. All good. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 22:20, 23 November 2016 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 11:15, 24 November 2016
Highlander
Happy to add a different camo scheme for the Highlander - anyone know of a unit that has one at this time period? Justin_Kase (talk) 08:34, 23 November 2016 (PST)
- I'm drawing a blank here. Something in the back of my mind says it was associated with House Liao, but generally the Highlander is not exactly a 3025 era posterchild... Frabby (talk) 22:20, 23 November 2016 (PST)
- Quite correct, the Highlander first became a Capellan manufactured design (under license) with Technical Readout: 3025 Revised thanks to the Unseen removals, Technical Readout: 3039 expanding on these Capellan rebuilt models. That said, no Capellan line units circa 3028 are noted as being Highlander users, but Combat Manual: Mercenaries has at least two merc units (with Capellan ties no less) who are confirmed as having/preserving Highlanders during the late Succession Wars - the 15th Dracons and the Northwind Highlanders.Cyc (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2016 (PST)
- Thank you both! I will work up a camo spec for one of them, likely the 15th Dracon, seeing as I had never heard of them before and it will help to expose people to another cool new unit. Hopefully, the new model that PGI releases in December will make for a Gray Death Legion mech (or be a good swap out for another that can then be GDL). That should fix that anachronism :) Justin_Kase (talk) 07:05, 24 November 2016 (PST)
- Quite correct, the Highlander first became a Capellan manufactured design (under license) with Technical Readout: 3025 Revised thanks to the Unseen removals, Technical Readout: 3039 expanding on these Capellan rebuilt models. That said, no Capellan line units circa 3028 are noted as being Highlander users, but Combat Manual: Mercenaries has at least two merc units (with Capellan ties no less) who are confirmed as having/preserving Highlanders during the late Succession Wars - the 15th Dracons and the Northwind Highlanders.Cyc (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2016 (PST)
Non-Canon, Fan made products should not be on server
Hi. I'm totally against this being on the server. We went though a purge years ago to remove this so Sarna would stand out being source of canon or at least non-fan made materials. Why is this here? Wrangler (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2016 (PST)
- It isn't. This is just an article about it (which is in line with Policy:Fanon, as it's a sufficiently high-profile product), and like in other such articles it includes a download link. All good. Frabby (talk) 22:20, 23 November 2016 (PST)