Difference between revisions of "Talk:Warlord"
Sarna News
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject BattleMechs}} | {{WikiProject BattleMechs}} | ||
| + | ==Notes== | ||
Editorial question: I had some background notes on the Warlord's behind-the-scenes evolution during writing. Where would those go, under Notes? --[[User:Cray|Cray]] 04:15, 19 January 2009 (PST) | Editorial question: I had some background notes on the Warlord's behind-the-scenes evolution during writing. Where would those go, under Notes? --[[User:Cray|Cray]] 04:15, 19 January 2009 (PST) | ||
:I had a similar problem when I tried to add the information on the [[Quickdraw]] that its name was changed to "Paladin" in the German edition. I've read somewhere that Trivia sections were discouraged, but have myself mercilessly ignored this guideline in the past if it exists. Perhaps a "Behind the scenes" section would be in order since it's OOC information; the info certainly is interesting and should go somewhere. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 04:33, 19 January 2009 (PST) | :I had a similar problem when I tried to add the information on the [[Quickdraw]] that its name was changed to "Paladin" in the German edition. I've read somewhere that Trivia sections were discouraged, but have myself mercilessly ignored this guideline in the past if it exists. Perhaps a "Behind the scenes" section would be in order since it's OOC information; the info certainly is interesting and should go somewhere. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 04:33, 19 January 2009 (PST) | ||
::I agree. Perhaps a new template that says something along the lines of "do not edit as this section was created by a CBT writer"? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 17:33, 20 January 2009 (PST) | ::I agree. Perhaps a new template that says something along the lines of "do not edit as this section was created by a CBT writer"? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 17:33, 20 January 2009 (PST) | ||
:::I'd say go ahead and edit all you want so long as the basic points don't change. Any write-up could always stand a second pair of editorial eyes. --[[User:Cray|Cray]] 06:42, 21 January 2009 (PST) | :::I'd say go ahead and edit all you want so long as the basic points don't change. Any write-up could always stand a second pair of editorial eyes. --[[User:Cray|Cray]] 06:42, 21 January 2009 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 11:16, 20 June 2022
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Notes
Editorial question: I had some background notes on the Warlord's behind-the-scenes evolution during writing. Where would those go, under Notes? --Cray 04:15, 19 January 2009 (PST)
- I had a similar problem when I tried to add the information on the Quickdraw that its name was changed to "Paladin" in the German edition. I've read somewhere that Trivia sections were discouraged, but have myself mercilessly ignored this guideline in the past if it exists. Perhaps a "Behind the scenes" section would be in order since it's OOC information; the info certainly is interesting and should go somewhere. Frabby 04:33, 19 January 2009 (PST)
- I agree. Perhaps a new template that says something along the lines of "do not edit as this section was created by a CBT writer"? --Scaletail 17:33, 20 January 2009 (PST)
- I'd say go ahead and edit all you want so long as the basic points don't change. Any write-up could always stand a second pair of editorial eyes. --Cray 06:42, 21 January 2009 (PST)
- I agree. Perhaps a new template that says something along the lines of "do not edit as this section was created by a CBT writer"? --Scaletail 17:33, 20 January 2009 (PST)