Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki talk:Combat Vehicle Portal"
Sarna News
(...why?) |
(resp) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I would prefer one that includes both Arrow IV, Thumper, Sniper and Long Tom ones. Or at least if an Arrow IV category is made, then one for tube artillery is also made. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | : I would prefer one that includes both Arrow IV, Thumper, Sniper and Long Tom ones. Or at least if an Arrow IV category is made, then one for tube artillery is also made. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: Why is the "fire support combat vehicle" category insufficient? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | :: Why is the "fire support combat vehicle" category insufficient? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::: Because the Fire Support category doesn't even mean Artillery. It includes LRM Carriers and other vehicles with potent long-range "normal" weaponry. | ||
| + | ::: Try this : Look at the 3050 era onward. Look at all the mechs with TAG. WHY do so many mechs need TAG? There was only one mech refitted with Arrow IV (Catapult) and damn few vehicles. I feel justified in suggesting it'd be good to nail this down. | ||
| + | ::: And I don't mind including the other Artillery vehicles either. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 05:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:54, 3 June 2010
Arrow IV Vehicles
I am proposing a portal of all vehicles armed with the Arrow IV. Is there disagreement to this? ClanWolverine101 06:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- I would prefer one that includes both Arrow IV, Thumper, Sniper and Long Tom ones. Or at least if an Arrow IV category is made, then one for tube artillery is also made. --Neufeld 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Why is the "fire support combat vehicle" category insufficient? --Scaletail 00:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Because the Fire Support category doesn't even mean Artillery. It includes LRM Carriers and other vehicles with potent long-range "normal" weaponry.
- Try this : Look at the 3050 era onward. Look at all the mechs with TAG. WHY do so many mechs need TAG? There was only one mech refitted with Arrow IV (Catapult) and damn few vehicles. I feel justified in suggesting it'd be good to nail this down.
- And I don't mind including the other Artillery vehicles either. ClanWolverine101 05:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Why is the "fire support combat vehicle" category insufficient? --Scaletail 00:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)