Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki talk:Project Infantry Weapons"
Sarna News
(→Good start!: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Good start! == | + | ==Good start!== |
Impressive start! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 01:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | Impressive start! [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 01:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Thanks much... lots of work... and covering 4-6 sets of game stats per article is going to be interesting... then there is the 6 sets of stat-tables...--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 04:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Retroing to BTroops & 1e & 2e from 3e & 4e and BattleTech stats== | ||
| + | BattleTroops will be easy to retro to being that there was established BT to BTroops conversion rules... MW1e & 2e are relatively easy too... (5d6+3 = 1 BT IIRC) the question is '''''should i''''' i may do it with a <nowiki><ref>Fanon</ref></nowiki> tag or <nowiki><ref>converted from 3e</ref></nowiki> or <nowiki><ref>converted from 4e</ref></nowiki>tag for the old school stats retroed from modern...--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 04:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:48, 10 February 2011
Good start!
Impressive start! ClanWolverine101 01:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks much... lots of work... and covering 4-6 sets of game stats per article is going to be interesting... then there is the 6 sets of stat-tables...--Cameron 04:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Retroing to BTroops & 1e & 2e from 3e & 4e and BattleTech stats
BattleTroops will be easy to retro to being that there was established BT to BTroops conversion rules... MW1e & 2e are relatively easy too... (5d6+3 = 1 BT IIRC) the question is should i i may do it with a <ref>Fanon</ref> tag or <ref>converted from 3e</ref> or <ref>converted from 4e</ref>tag for the old school stats retroed from modern...--Cameron 04:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)