Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Individual JumpShips"
(→Merge for Notable Ships?: don't like straight merge) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Uh...that's why I'm suggesting the merge [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 18:27, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | :::Uh...that's why I'm suggesting the merge [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 18:27, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
::::Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | ::::Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
+ | :::::I think that such a category could become quite full very quickly. I think it would be wiser to split out the various types of craft. I also dislike the wording "Notable" because that has a specific connotation to wikis (see [[Policy:Notability]]. Perhaps "Category:Individual Ships" could be a parent category for a few categories that themselves contain the actual articles? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 19:10, 21 May 2009 (PDT) |
Revision as of 22:10, 21 May 2009
Merge for Notable Ships?
I think it would save duplication on individual drop/jump/warships categories by making use of generic call all Category:Notable Ships Cyc 16:28, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
- Notable ships goes beyond JumpShips. Its for ALL ships. Example: Tyrannous Rex (Dropship), which was Pocket Warship during the Operation Bulldog and Jihad, then became cargo-conversion for Republic Era until the Blackout. Where the ship came into service of Swordsworn leader Aaron Sandoval to become his mobile governor house / campaign command ship. When i wrote Notable Ships, its meant to cover from Wet-navy, from dropships, Warships and JumpShips.
I think Individual JumpShips is too limiting. -- Wrangler 17:51, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
- Uh...that's why I'm suggesting the merge Cyc 18:27, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
- Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- Wrangler 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
- I think that such a category could become quite full very quickly. I think it would be wiser to split out the various types of craft. I also dislike the wording "Notable" because that has a specific connotation to wikis (see Policy:Notability. Perhaps "Category:Individual Ships" could be a parent category for a few categories that themselves contain the actual articles? --Scaletail 19:10, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
- Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- Wrangler 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
- Uh...that's why I'm suggesting the merge Cyc 18:27, 21 May 2009 (PDT)