Difference between revisions of "Talk:1st Thorin Regiment"

m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: IIRC (hard to check at work) [[Field Manual: Updates]] list them as the [[Thorin FTM]] again too. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 19:46, 4 March 2009 (PST)
 
: IIRC (hard to check at work) [[Field Manual: Updates]] list them as the [[Thorin FTM]] again too. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 19:46, 4 March 2009 (PST)
 +
 +
::The 1st Thorin consists of the original Thorin FTM and various other rebells. Later "Archer's Avengers" spread to two further regiments: the Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen.
 +
::From what I have heard in a forum, The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen stayed on Twycross after the CJF-incursion, while the 1st Thorin flew back to aid Victor. The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen were destroyed by Clan Diamond Shark when it took over Twycross. The 1st Thorin went back to it's original role of defending Thorin.
 +
::Maybe it was renamed to Thorin FTM in that process.
 +
::I would keep these two units seperate (at least for now) because I think, it would add additional confusion as long as the articles are not finished. --[[User:Detlef|Detlef]] 04:28, 5 March 2009 (PST)

Revision as of 08:28, 5 March 2009

Since they're the same unit, I propose that this article be merged into Thorin FTM. --Scaletail 18:09, 4 March 2009 (PST)

IIRC (hard to check at work) Field Manual: Updates list them as the Thorin FTM again too. Cyc 19:46, 4 March 2009 (PST)
The 1st Thorin consists of the original Thorin FTM and various other rebells. Later "Archer's Avengers" spread to two further regiments: the Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen.
From what I have heard in a forum, The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen stayed on Twycross after the CJF-incursion, while the 1st Thorin flew back to aid Victor. The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen were destroyed by Clan Diamond Shark when it took over Twycross. The 1st Thorin went back to it's original role of defending Thorin.
Maybe it was renamed to Thorin FTM in that process.
I would keep these two units seperate (at least for now) because I think, it would add additional confusion as long as the articles are not finished. --Detlef 04:28, 5 March 2009 (PST)