Difference between revisions of "Talk:1st Thorin Regiment"
m |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: IIRC (hard to check at work) [[Field Manual: Updates]] list them as the [[Thorin FTM]] again too. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 19:46, 4 March 2009 (PST) | : IIRC (hard to check at work) [[Field Manual: Updates]] list them as the [[Thorin FTM]] again too. [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 19:46, 4 March 2009 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::The 1st Thorin consists of the original Thorin FTM and various other rebells. Later "Archer's Avengers" spread to two further regiments: the Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen. | ||
+ | ::From what I have heard in a forum, The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen stayed on Twycross after the CJF-incursion, while the 1st Thorin flew back to aid Victor. The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen were destroyed by Clan Diamond Shark when it took over Twycross. The 1st Thorin went back to it's original role of defending Thorin. | ||
+ | ::Maybe it was renamed to Thorin FTM in that process. | ||
+ | ::I would keep these two units seperate (at least for now) because I think, it would add additional confusion as long as the articles are not finished. --[[User:Detlef|Detlef]] 04:28, 5 March 2009 (PST) |
Revision as of 08:28, 5 March 2009
Since they're the same unit, I propose that this article be merged into Thorin FTM. --Scaletail 18:09, 4 March 2009 (PST)
- IIRC (hard to check at work) Field Manual: Updates list them as the Thorin FTM again too. Cyc 19:46, 4 March 2009 (PST)
- The 1st Thorin consists of the original Thorin FTM and various other rebells. Later "Archer's Avengers" spread to two further regiments: the Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen.
- From what I have heard in a forum, The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen stayed on Twycross after the CJF-incursion, while the 1st Thorin flew back to aid Victor. The Muphrid-Rangers and the Minutemen were destroyed by Clan Diamond Shark when it took over Twycross. The 1st Thorin went back to it's original role of defending Thorin.
- Maybe it was renamed to Thorin FTM in that process.
- I would keep these two units seperate (at least for now) because I think, it would add additional confusion as long as the articles are not finished. --Detlef 04:28, 5 March 2009 (PST)