Difference between revisions of "Talk:202nd Striker (Clan Steel Viper)"
(→Merge proposal: new section) |
Dark Jaguar (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So I'm proposing this be merged with the 83rd Fang. The content as it stands is identical, and there's no real reason we need two articles. We can set up a redirect that will send the "202nd Striker (Steel Viper)" to the "83rd Fang" article. Any takers? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | So I'm proposing this be merged with the 83rd Fang. The content as it stands is identical, and there's no real reason we need two articles. We can set up a redirect that will send the "202nd Striker (Steel Viper)" to the "83rd Fang" article. Any takers? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 14:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | : I totally agree. --[[User:Dark Jaguar|Dark Jaguar]] ([[User talk:Dark Jaguar|talk]]) 13:55, 30 November 2013 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 17:55, 30 November 2013
Merge proposal[edit]
So I'm proposing this be merged with the 83rd Fang. The content as it stands is identical, and there's no real reason we need two articles. We can set up a redirect that will send the "202nd Striker (Steel Viper)" to the "83rd Fang" article. Any takers? ClanWolverine101 14:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- I totally agree. --Dark Jaguar (talk) 13:55, 30 November 2013 (PST)