Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aesir (Combat Vehicle)"

(Created page with 'I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as Heavy Metal Vee, when the vehicle has given wheels, its…')
 
m
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Engine rating==
 
I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as [[Heavy Metal Vee]], when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 
I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as [[Heavy Metal Vee]], when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Ask [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] what he meant. He usually understands that some of his entries need cleaning up. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 03:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I suspect Wrangler's talking about the fact that there's a disconnect between the art and stats.  It's obviously a wheeled design from the artwork but its stats are written up on the dossier as if it were tracked. If it was a properly Wheeled vehicle, it'd have a 145 rated engine instead of the listed 165 rated engine.  --[[User:Istal devalis|Istal devalis]] 15:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Thanks, both of you; that makes sense. I rewrote the text appropriately.  --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 21:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Sorry to chirp in so late. That is correct, there is a discrepancy between the stats of the dossiers and what Heavy Metal Vee dictates what kind of engine rating vehicle (and vehicle type) should have based on rules its programmed.  Sometimes I have trouble formulating correct grammer passages when I'm typing them out. Sorry for the confusion. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 22:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Oh, no worries. If I was thinking, I would have gotten it the first time. I hope I've described it accurately - if not, do whatever needs doing. And thanks. --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 23:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::Heyguys just so everybody knows,I have changed the infobox to reflect the 145 rating as it had been left as the 165. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 10:45, 23 September 2014 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 08:48, 12 December 2023

Engine rating[edit]

I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as Heavy Metal Vee, when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --Museling 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Ask Wrangler what he meant. He usually understands that some of his entries need cleaning up. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 03:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
I suspect Wrangler's talking about the fact that there's a disconnect between the art and stats. It's obviously a wheeled design from the artwork but its stats are written up on the dossier as if it were tracked. If it was a properly Wheeled vehicle, it'd have a 145 rated engine instead of the listed 165 rated engine. --Istal devalis 15:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, both of you; that makes sense. I rewrote the text appropriately. --Museling 21:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to chirp in so late. That is correct, there is a discrepancy between the stats of the dossiers and what Heavy Metal Vee dictates what kind of engine rating vehicle (and vehicle type) should have based on rules its programmed. Sometimes I have trouble formulating correct grammer passages when I'm typing them out. Sorry for the confusion. -- Wrangler 22:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh, no worries. If I was thinking, I would have gotten it the first time. I hope I've described it accurately - if not, do whatever needs doing. And thanks. --Museling 23:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Heyguys just so everybody knows,I have changed the infobox to reflect the 145 rating as it had been left as the 165. --Dmon (talk) 10:45, 23 September 2014 (PDT)