Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aesir (Combat Vehicle)"
(Created page with 'I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as Heavy Metal Vee, when the vehicle has given wheels, its…') |
m |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Engine rating== | ||
I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as [[Heavy Metal Vee]], when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as [[Heavy Metal Vee]], when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Ask [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] what he meant. He usually understands that some of his entries need cleaning up. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 03:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I suspect Wrangler's talking about the fact that there's a disconnect between the art and stats. It's obviously a wheeled design from the artwork but its stats are written up on the dossier as if it were tracked. If it was a properly Wheeled vehicle, it'd have a 145 rated engine instead of the listed 165 rated engine. --[[User:Istal devalis|Istal devalis]] 15:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Thanks, both of you; that makes sense. I rewrote the text appropriately. --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 21:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Sorry to chirp in so late. That is correct, there is a discrepancy between the stats of the dossiers and what Heavy Metal Vee dictates what kind of engine rating vehicle (and vehicle type) should have based on rules its programmed. Sometimes I have trouble formulating correct grammer passages when I'm typing them out. Sorry for the confusion. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 22:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Oh, no worries. If I was thinking, I would have gotten it the first time. I hope I've described it accurately - if not, do whatever needs doing. And thanks. --[[User:Museling|Museling]] 23:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Heyguys just so everybody knows,I have changed the infobox to reflect the 145 rating as it had been left as the 165. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 10:45, 23 September 2014 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 08:48, 12 December 2023
Engine rating[edit]
I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as Heavy Metal Vee, when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --Museling 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ask Wrangler what he meant. He usually understands that some of his entries need cleaning up. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 03:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I suspect Wrangler's talking about the fact that there's a disconnect between the art and stats. It's obviously a wheeled design from the artwork but its stats are written up on the dossier as if it were tracked. If it was a properly Wheeled vehicle, it'd have a 145 rated engine instead of the listed 165 rated engine. --Istal devalis 15:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, both of you; that makes sense. I rewrote the text appropriately. --Museling 21:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry to chirp in so late. That is correct, there is a discrepancy between the stats of the dossiers and what Heavy Metal Vee dictates what kind of engine rating vehicle (and vehicle type) should have based on rules its programmed. Sometimes I have trouble formulating correct grammer passages when I'm typing them out. Sorry for the confusion. -- Wrangler 22:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, no worries. If I was thinking, I would have gotten it the first time. I hope I've described it accurately - if not, do whatever needs doing. And thanks. --Museling 23:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)