Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armed Forces of the Federated Suns"

(Page size)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
The blurb text on this article notes the Brigade of Guards as a regional unit. It was always my belief that they were drawn from all over the FS. Which is correct, and can we get a reference? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 13:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 
The blurb text on this article notes the Brigade of Guards as a regional unit. It was always my belief that they were drawn from all over the FS. Which is correct, and can we get a reference? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 13:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Page size ==
 +
This articles is about half as large as it should be. Something needs to be moved or removed in order to bring that size back down to where it should be. I think there are far too many images here (even on my DSL connection they didn't load right up). I suggest removing the paint schemes from the articles and seeing where that puts it. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 24 March 2010

Regarding the NAIS - how could Ian Davion have been an alum when Hanse Davion founded it after his death? :) ClanWolverine101

Graduated from it when it was just NAMA. Cyc 21:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I would suggest a split. The NAMA's being folded into the NAIS is sort of a totally different thing. ClanWolverine101
I disagree. It's the same school, just with a different name. --Scaletail 23:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough - Would you agree to somehow clarifying that issue in the text? ClanWolverine101 00:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Davion Guard - Regional Loyalties

The blurb text on this article notes the Brigade of Guards as a regional unit. It was always my belief that they were drawn from all over the FS. Which is correct, and can we get a reference? ClanWolverine101 13:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Page size

This articles is about half as large as it should be. Something needs to be moved or removed in order to bring that size back down to where it should be. I think there are far too many images here (even on my DSL connection they didn't load right up). I suggest removing the paint schemes from the articles and seeing where that puts it. --Scaletail 00:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)