Difference between revisions of "Talk:Avatar (BattleTechnology)"
(→Apocryphal?: resp) |
m (moved Talk:Avatar (BattleTechnology BattleMech) to Talk:Avatar (BattleTechnology): renamed to drop the BM designation (and just the non-canon source), since that is what seems to be the way when done with articles on BMs from video games) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 21:55, 30 January 2012
Apocryphal?
Is this mech still canon? ClanWolverine101 17:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- No. I've added the proper template. Thanks. --Scaletail 17:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Cool. I knew the Mechforce mechs weren't, wasn't sure about B.Technology. ClanWolverine101 19:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)