Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Knight"
Sarna News
(→Word of Blake: resp) |
(→Word of Blake: resp.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:It would have to be referenced somewhere that is is a Blakist 'Mech. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | :It would have to be referenced somewhere that is is a Blakist 'Mech. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Let me clarify : I believe sufficient circumstantial evidence exists that the Black Knight was used by WoB in significant numbers, even if they weren't actually building new Black Knights. Does that work? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 12 March 2010
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Word of Blake
Should this fall under WoB category as well? Just look at the Fall of Terra cover. ClanWolverine101
- It would have to be referenced somewhere that is is a Blakist 'Mech. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Let me clarify : I believe sufficient circumstantial evidence exists that the Black Knight was used by WoB in significant numbers, even if they weren't actually building new Black Knights. Does that work? ClanWolverine101