Difference between revisions of "Talk:Caliban Nebula"

Line 12: Line 12:
 
::OK, I uploaded the pic (from Historical: Operation Klondike, info forthcoming...), but it needs to be rather large in order to read the names on the image.  Is 500px too large?  Maybe 450px is still legible...?--[[User:S.gage|S.gage]] 20:17, 7 March 2012 (PST)
 
::OK, I uploaded the pic (from Historical: Operation Klondike, info forthcoming...), but it needs to be rather large in order to read the names on the image.  Is 500px too large?  Maybe 450px is still legible...?--[[User:S.gage|S.gage]] 20:17, 7 March 2012 (PST)
 
:::Looks good to me.  All maps need to be easily readable or there's really no point, so that's perfect. That's a good map to show, too, I was basing my text description off the same map.  Now that I see it again, that nebula must be at least 300 light years, not just 200. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 23:58, 7 March 2012 (PST)
 
:::Looks good to me.  All maps need to be easily readable or there's really no point, so that's perfect. That's a good map to show, too, I was basing my text description off the same map.  Now that I see it again, that nebula must be at least 300 light years, not just 200. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 23:58, 7 March 2012 (PST)
::::I looked at the key and used the measurement provided...  it is shown on this map as over 400 light years wide anti sin to spin.  I'll put that in there for the approximate length.  Who knows if it will be altered or additinal info will be give on this one.  --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 00:08, 8 March 2012 (PST)
+
::::I looked at the key and used the measurement provided...  it is shown on this map as over 400 light years wide anti spin to spin.  I'll put that in there for the approximate length.  Who knows if it will be altered or additinal info will be give on this one.  --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 00:08, 8 March 2012 (PST)

Revision as of 04:09, 8 March 2012

This article is within the scope of the Planets WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of planets. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: Planets team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

Question

Should Kerensky's Cloak and Veil of the Protector link to this page? Should they? I have seen both names red linked on several pages, so those links would be filled now. -Rebs 01:52, 5 March 2012 (PST)

I think so. They're just different names for the same thing. --Scaletail 17:08, 5 March 2012 (PST)
I set up a redirect to Kerensky's Cloak.--Doneve 17:17, 5 March 2012 (PST)
I wish there was more basic info on this in the books, simply for curiosity, if not accuracy.--Rebs 22:04, 6 March 2012 (PST)

Thank You

I had long planned on writing this page but never got to it (I even prepped a .png image for it). Thank you for doing this!--S.gage 23:08, 6 March 2012 (PST)

No prob! I have no image ready, so if you would like to upload the .png that would be awesome. --Rebs 00:05, 7 March 2012 (PST)
OK, I uploaded the pic (from Historical: Operation Klondike, info forthcoming...), but it needs to be rather large in order to read the names on the image. Is 500px too large? Maybe 450px is still legible...?--S.gage 20:17, 7 March 2012 (PST)
Looks good to me. All maps need to be easily readable or there's really no point, so that's perfect. That's a good map to show, too, I was basing my text description off the same map. Now that I see it again, that nebula must be at least 300 light years, not just 200. --Rebs 23:58, 7 March 2012 (PST)
I looked at the key and used the measurement provided... it is shown on this map as over 400 light years wide anti spin to spin. I'll put that in there for the approximate length. Who knows if it will be altered or additinal info will be give on this one. --Rebs 00:08, 8 March 2012 (PST)