Difference between revisions of "Talk:Demolisher II"
(→Merge with Demolisher article?: no it's not) |
(My mistake) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I noticed that the variants (II and III) of the Demolisher are already covered in the original article for the Demolisher. Guess it depends on wether you regard this as a variant or a proper new design. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 18:19, 7 June 2008 (CDT) | I noticed that the variants (II and III) of the Demolisher are already covered in the original article for the Demolisher. Guess it depends on wether you regard this as a variant or a proper new design. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 18:19, 7 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Actually, it is not covered in [[Demolisher]]. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 17:53, 8 June 2008 (CDT) | :Actually, it is not covered in [[Demolisher]]. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 17:53, 8 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::Oops. The ''Demolisher II'' is apparently a different vehicle from the ''Demolisher mkII'' that was mentioned as a variant. My fault. I wish TPTB would improve their designations to be more... well, sensible, intuitive, you get the idea. :/ [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 06:48, 9 June 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 07:48, 9 June 2008
Merge with Demolisher article?
I noticed that the variants (II and III) of the Demolisher are already covered in the original article for the Demolisher. Guess it depends on wether you regard this as a variant or a proper new design. Frabby 18:19, 7 June 2008 (CDT)
- Actually, it is not covered in Demolisher. --Scaletail 17:53, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
- Oops. The Demolisher II is apparently a different vehicle from the Demolisher mkII that was mentioned as a variant. My fault. I wish TPTB would improve their designations to be more... well, sensible, intuitive, you get the idea. :/ Frabby 06:48, 9 June 2008 (CDT)