Difference between revisions of "Talk:Duchy of Tamarind-Abbey"

(Comment about stuff that does not belong here.)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
::: Per [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Factions|community consensus]], the articles stay together. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 
::: Per [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_Factions|community consensus]], the articles stay together. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 
:::: Crap. Wish I had been told earlier. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 03:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 
:::: Crap. Wish I had been told earlier. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 03:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Irrelevant info ==
 +
 +
In my opinion, the details about the fighting between FWL and Lyrans during the start of the Jihad does not belong here. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 07:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:31, 31 August 2011

Mech.gif This article is within the scope of the Project Factions, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Factions. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Mech.gif



Duchy of Tamarind[edit]

Can we safely redirect Duchy of Tamarind to this article? ClanWolverine101 22:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure, the Duchy of Tamarind-Abbey is a small star nation. Duchy of Tamarind is/was a providence/state of the League. Not alot happen (written history anyways), i was hoping that we could keep the League states seperated from the small-nation that formed after words. -- Wrangler 00:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
I am writing a Duchy of Tamarind article, as an independent piece. ClanWolverine101 00:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Per community consensus, the articles stay together. --Scaletail 01:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Crap. Wish I had been told earlier. ClanWolverine101 03:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Irrelevant info[edit]

In my opinion, the details about the fighting between FWL and Lyrans during the start of the Jihad does not belong here. --Neufeld 07:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)