Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fourth Succession War"

(Created page with 'It never ceases to amaze me how anyone can keep a straight face in regards to the 4th SW. You only need to look at the TO & E of both sides to see the sheer ridiculousness of the…')
 
(There were more than two nations involved)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
It never ceases to amaze me how anyone can keep a straight face in regards to the 4th SW. You only need to look at the TO & E of both sides to see the sheer ridiculousness of the situation. And yet the FS tries so very hard to make it look like a great victory. HA!!! ---Aldous
 
It never ceases to amaze me how anyone can keep a straight face in regards to the 4th SW. You only need to look at the TO & E of both sides to see the sheer ridiculousness of the situation. And yet the FS tries so very hard to make it look like a great victory. HA!!! ---Aldous
 +
:It's not so much the victory as the scope of the victory. The FS crushed the Capellans with minimal losses on their own side. They conquered half the Confederation while losing only a handful of worlds to the Combine. Even in 3067, with all the reversals the Suns had suffered, the nation was still larger than it had been in 3025. That shows the magnitude of the conquest. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 15:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:19, 27 September 2009

It never ceases to amaze me how anyone can keep a straight face in regards to the 4th SW. You only need to look at the TO & E of both sides to see the sheer ridiculousness of the situation. And yet the FS tries so very hard to make it look like a great victory. HA!!! ---Aldous

It's not so much the victory as the scope of the victory. The FS crushed the Capellans with minimal losses on their own side. They conquered half the Confederation while losing only a handful of worlds to the Combine. Even in 3067, with all the reversals the Suns had suffered, the nation was still larger than it had been in 3025. That shows the magnitude of the conquest. --Scaletail 15:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)