Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minnesota Tribe"

(Event)
(resp)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Intention==
 
I intend to provide more information shortly.  [[User:Communibus locis|Locis]] 09:12, 8 January 2008 (CST) communibus locis
 
I intend to provide more information shortly.  [[User:Communibus locis|Locis]] 09:12, 8 January 2008 (CST) communibus locis
 +
  
 
==Event==
 
==Event==
 
Might it be worth re-writing this as a historical event? --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 18:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 
Might it be worth re-writing this as a historical event? --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 18:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
:At first glance, I'm with you. However -discussion point- after ''[[Jihad Conspiracies: Interstellar Players 2]]'' and before ''[[Historical: Operation Klondike]]'', the idea that the Minnesota Tribe was absolutely the Wolverines seemed to be only a component of a conspiracy theory surrounding the Word of Blake. Are you suggesting writing it as a 'confirmed' correlation to 'powers' within the WOB, or just write it as confirmed Wolverine encounter on its own?--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 19:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:31, 15 March 2010

Intention

I intend to provide more information shortly. Locis 09:12, 8 January 2008 (CST) communibus locis


Event

Might it be worth re-writing this as a historical event? --Dmon 18:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

At first glance, I'm with you. However -discussion point- after Jihad Conspiracies: Interstellar Players 2 and before Historical: Operation Klondike, the idea that the Minnesota Tribe was absolutely the Wolverines seemed to be only a component of a conspiracy theory surrounding the Word of Blake. Are you suggesting writing it as a 'confirmed' correlation to 'powers' within the WOB, or just write it as confirmed Wolverine encounter on its own?--Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)