Difference between revisions of "Talk:Olympus"
(great job) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Very excellent job, RagTag. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | ::Very excellent job, RagTag. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 22:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::A couple of minor edits, but your grammer and word choices are ''very'' good. I found this phrase to be rather humorous: "'''large'''ly '''short'''ening", which I changed to "significantly shortening". Large is associated with size or volume, while short is associated with length of measurement (size or time). My only caution is on a very common trip-up (that I commit all the time): beware mixing present tense and past tense, they can even be tricky in the same tense. --[[User:Trebor|Trebor]] 14:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:33, 24 February 2010
Create Olympus (Recharge Station) as stub. Feel free to complete the arcticle.Doneve 20:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Added the descriptions and stuff, anybody care to check? --RagTag 14:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- A couple of minor edits, but your grammer and word choices are very good. I found this phrase to be rather humorous: "largely shortening", which I changed to "significantly shortening". Large is associated with size or volume, while short is associated with length of measurement (size or time). My only caution is on a very common trip-up (that I commit all the time): beware mixing present tense and past tense, they can even be tricky in the same tense. --Trebor 14:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)