Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scauld"
(Added confirmation detail on the planet being renamed (don't want to lose this in another forum crash)) |
m (Text replacement - "{{WikiProject Planets|tr=new}}" to "") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ||
==Austerlitz/Scauld== | ==Austerlitz/Scauld== | ||
The renaming of Austerlitz to Scauld was confirmed by the [http://www.classicbattletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,9040.0.html Catalyst Game Labs writing staff] in August 2011: | The renaming of Austerlitz to Scauld was confirmed by the [http://www.classicbattletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,9040.0.html Catalyst Game Labs writing staff] in August 2011: |
Latest revision as of 16:47, 19 July 2022
Austerlitz/Scauld[edit]
The renaming of Austerlitz to Scauld was confirmed by the Catalyst Game Labs writing staff in August 2011:
“ | Thanks to the quality of the maps available now and the availability of the books in PDF format, it's possible to overlay copies of maps onto each other and scale them to the same scale using established systems as a reference points, and doing so for former provinces of the Rim Worlds Republic and the Map of the Inner Sphere 3130 shows a number of systems with different names that share the same location on the two maps. I was wondering if it's possible to confirm if they are in fact the same?
The systems I've been looking at are:
|
” |
— BrokenMnemonic, 10 Aug 2011 |
“ | Correct, yes.
With regards, Øystein |
” |
— Øystein Tvedten, BattleTech Line Developer, 18 Aug 2011 |